P u l l M y e F i n g e r
A p e n s i v e b l o g e x u d i n g o u t v a r i o u s o r i f i c e s



My Quick Thoughts On $700 Billion

← previous: The Worst Sales Job Ever Another Update On The House (Pics) :next →
this blog

most recent
rss feed
about me
archives
calendar
search

friends' blogs
life outside the box
the murky depths
more or less
faith and mika's mommy
all over the place

other blogs
systemic
centauri dreams

pictures
london
hungary
italy
holland
thailand
vietnam '05
hawaii '05
hawaii '06
vietnam '08
korea
mexico

mom's recipes
white cake
oatmeal raisin cookies
molasses cookies
texas bread sticks
caramel corn

news
ny times
la times

open source
cygwin
sourceforge
debian
suse
openoffice
wikipedia
winregsh

space
mars rovers
mars recon orbiter
mars express
cassini
phoenix

government
volunteer match

Topic(s): me
2008-10-02 02:11:11 US/Pacific

You reap what you sow. After 20 years of voting incompetence in to office, the citizens of the United States finally see the results: a stinking pile of refuse slightly resembling an economy. Democrat, Republican, it doesn't matter. Both parties mucked this one up badly, and both were complicit.

How is it we elect these people in to office year after year? That's a tough question to answer. Seems like the answer resides somewhere in the average attention span of the average citizen. We're a nation largely collectively distracted by pop music stars and pro football players. And where that doesn't work, we're a nation divided by same-sex marriage and gun control. All of those issues are small potatoes compared to the economy. Can't we all agree? Let's put those issues aside. We need to elect people in to office who care about the country and have the capacity to undo the damage caused by 20 years of incompetence, with a minimal amount of pain.

Who might that be? Most likely somewhere other than D and R on your ballot.

I can't believe the same people who caused the current economic crisis, are the same people who failed to see it coming, are the same people who denied its arrival, are the same people who are responsible for fixing it! Their fix is to print $700 billion? And they say the repercussions for not selecting their fix would be terrible. I have to question that.

What's a good analogy for this? How about this one... while you're walking the streets, a mugger points a gun at you and tells you to give him $700 billion no questions asked, or else something terrible will happen.

No, here's a better analogy... a mugger calls you on the phone and tells you to meet him on street X in 20 years so that he can mug you. Twenty years go by, and while you're walking on street X, a mugger points a gun at you and tells you to give him $700 billion no questions asked, or else something terrible will happen.

Let me try again. An even better analogy... a mugger calls you on the phone and tells you to meet him on street X in 20 years so that he can mug you. Twenty years go by, and while you're walking on street X, a mugger points a gun at you and tells you to give him $700 billion no questions asked, or else something terrible will happen immediately. The mugger also says that even if you do give him $700 billion, he'll find you in 20 more years and something even more terrible will happen at that time.

Firstly, you're stupid for walking on street X. But because you're already on street X, what's your best recourse? You can give the mugger $700 billion and hope he doesn't show himself in 20 years time. Or you can give him not a dime and hope something terrible is at least survivable.

I'm writing this to say we should not print $700 billion. It's a very bad idea. Printing more money causes inflation. Inflation causes your money to be worth less. Your money is the dollar. The world as a whole will lose confidence in the dollar. Your quality of life relative to the world will decrease relative to the confidence decrease in the dollar.

Not printing $700 billion also causes problems. The problem is there's no money to pay off the debt we as a populace have accumulated the previous 20 years. There will be loads and loads of loan defaults and failed loan institutions (banks). People will lose money. It will really suck for a year or a few years. But it will not suck permanently.

Please, please, please. Do not support the printing of $700 billion.

The same people who caused this problem, are the same people fixing it! Stop for a moment and calculate the odds that maybe the same people are creating yet a larger problem.

Please, please, please. Do not vote in to office the people who caused the problem. The people in office are at best incompetent. This much has been proven. And I don't mean the people currently holding office. I mean the people who are currently holding office, and anyone who has held office anytime in the last 20 years, and anybody associated with them or their power base.



Pulled eFingers:

Stacey — 2008-10-02 15:23:21 US/Pacific —
One of the problems is that there are consistently NO "good" people running for office!
steve — 2008-10-02 20:03:03 US/Pacific —
I blame the hippies
Eric — 2008-10-03 02:25:30 US/Pacific —
Re: no good candidates.

They are there. Look somewhere other than D and R.
Mom 2008-10-03 10:54:27 US/Pacific —
The only hope that any of the high rolling thieves will ever be punished is if the current electorate that took the lions share of the money, is not re-elected. If the money grabbers are re-elected, the new President (one of their own) will thwart any FBI findings from turning into prosecutions. The FBI investigations should be allowed to go forward, unfettered. I have emailed every one in government and told them that I will actively campaign against them if they vote for any bail out, but I am only a voice of one. I don't think that they even care, after all, they now have so much money...!
steve — 2008-10-03 11:41:39 US/Pacific —
Well, despite all of our posting on this blog, the bill passed congress today. And then some... all kinds of riders tacked on that will cost us billions more. Supporters are saying that we will see a return on this "investment." Time will tell.
Eric — 2008-10-03 13:38:06 US/Pacific —
Re: return on investment.

If there is one, do you think the tax payers will see any return? No. The government will find some way to spend it. Be it on social programs or worse yet wars.

The bill should have had one more rider. One that says if you vote yes on this bill then you forfeit all of your savings and property, except you can keep what the average American has. That would rake in billions.

I'm very upset. We may be witnessing the beginning of the decline of the United States.
steve — 2008-10-03 14:22:12 US/Pacific —
Every civilization has its ups ad downs. I'm not ready to say ours is in "decline." We have been through worse, and came back stronger. One positive aspect of the bill is that some of the Sarbanes-Oxley "mark to market" rules were changed or suspended. This will allow banks to write down only the loss on bad loans, and not the entire amount of the loan.

The next few years will be interesting. Unemployment is over 7% now, which is the scariest thing to me. Things could get really bad if we see 10%.

The US is on the bleeding edge of economic policy. We are managing the biggest economy, and the most resources the world has ever seen. Some things work, and some don't. Unfortunately we have to learn as we go along. I agree that we should have seen this coming and prevented it, but it's hard to shut down a party when lots of people are making money.



Exercise Your eFinger:

name:
email:
url:
response:
October 2008
 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
           1  2  3  4 
  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 
 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 
 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 
 26 27 28 29 30 31