P u l l M y e F i n g e r
A p e n s i v e b l o g e x u d i n g o u t v a r i o u s o r i f i c e s



The Return Of Proposition J

← previous: Back From Detroit Flying Cars And Skyways: A Brief Mathematical Analysis :next →
this blog

most recent
rss feed
about me
archives
calendar
search

friends' blogs
life outside the box
the murky depths
more or less
faith and mika's mommy
all over the place

other blogs
systemic
centauri dreams

pictures
london
hungary
italy
holland
thailand
vietnam '05
hawaii '05
hawaii '06
vietnam '08
korea
mexico

mom's recipes
white cake
oatmeal raisin cookies
molasses cookies
texas bread sticks
caramel corn

news
ny times
la times

open source
cygwin
sourceforge
debian
suse
openoffice
wikipedia
winregsh

space
mars rovers
mars recon orbiter
mars express
cassini
phoenix

government
volunteer match

Topic(s): me
2008-04-16 01:40:40 US/Pacific

It's been four years since Proposition J was passed in Mountain View. If you'll recall, I posted about Proposition J at that time.

Proposition J expired two months ago. Back up for ratification in 2008, it's being resurrected under a different letter: C. I probably wouldn't have noticed about Proposition C until a week or two before the election, except I received an unsolicited phone call from the C staff. Ever the diligent voter, I pressed the matter.

I asked what happened to Proposition J. What happened to the funds raised by Proposition J. Were the funds spent appropriately. Who was on the oversight committee. Those sorts of questions. Probably not what the called had expected.

So it took a few days, but I got an answer to all of my questions. The breakdown of all the money raised by Proposition J during 2006-07 can be found online. The members of the oversight committee are also listed.

I have to admit I am impressed. I wish that all money spent by a government could be listed so clearly.

Now, some of Proposition J's proceeds go toward stuff I am not so sure was worth spending for (legal costs: $69k). But at least it is clearly listed, and I can be almost certain none of the proceeds for 2006-07 went directly in to some third party's pocket book.

That's not to say I'll be supporting the kiddie font signs sure to pop up in lawns around Mountain View. They'll probably irk me just like J's. (Note that the web site already has kiddie font!)



Pulled eFingers:

steve — 2008-04-16 23:31:32 US/Pacific —
I'm sure the callers enjoy it when engineers answer the phone. We tend to remove all the enthusiasm out of just about any situation.

Perhaps the letter "c" is sortof a play on words to persuade the changing demographic.

Proposition si!
Eric — 2008-04-18 02:29:46 US/Pacific —
In Mountain View, I think more of the demographic would probably recognize 2.998*10^8 m/s.
Marc Aho 2008-04-21 22:33:11 US/Pacific —
I saw on your old post you thought because you are a renter that the tax increase won't affect you. Haha, that's like saying that raising taxes for corporations won't increase the costs of goods to the consumers.

It all trickles down...Landlords just pass it on to renters.
Mom 2008-05-10 22:30:07 US/Pacific —
The 69K was what it cost them to get answers to the questions that you asked from their attorneys; probably no one else had asked any questions...



Exercise Your eFinger:

name:
email:
url:
response:
April 2008
 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
        1  2  3  4  5 
  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 
 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 
 27 28 29 30